[zyNoT]

...

Also if you are flashing ANY CM2350 module, you cannot use INSITE 7.6.x it is too old and you will end up with corruption of engine control code.

...

 All a person has to have is the SP5 patch for 7.6 and it is fully compatible for flashing all CM2350's that are pre-X15 engine model era.

Incorrect. Not only have most of the BDR’s moved over to 9.40.16 phase, but even the older 9.40.13 phase cannot be properly flashed with INSITE 7.6 even with SP5 (7.6.2.240 SP5). I have done extensive testing and even when all parameters look good, all the tables addresses and RLOC addresses have shifted leaving the calibration and engine control code subfile in a corrupted state. Usually you will see a fuel fault code and 2-3 other ones saying shorted to high source. You will see that even after flashing template back, you will see that it does not solve this problem and random fault codes will show up even if added to CAGT block table. 

7.6.2.240 SP5 is too old for any CM2350 especially when using newer assembly matrix.

There is nothing special about the flashing process in INSITE, it is exactly the same as Calterm except the configs are built into a Tool MSNR database. You are essentially using an ecfg from 2003 to flash a cal with a phase made in 2015 with new parameters and addresses that 7.6 INSITE doesn’t even know exist as it was created before they existed. Just trying to save others future problems, but hey if y’all want to blow up some engines then keep using INSITE 7.6.

while this is partially true, only the 2015 phase 2350's have this problem.  You can still flash a early pre 2015 phase 2350 with 762 sp5 and its all happy(even if it has a current calibration in it).  Its when you get into the newer CPL 2350's (2015 phase) ones that can have issues.  I agree with your statement on some of these newer ones and to do it right get a current version of insite.

It works just fine, and i guarantee that ive flashed more than 99.99% of people on this forum(stock or not), if not everyone on this forum.  Cummins have alot of leeway for shady programming practices compared to every other manufacturer.  Ive done things that no way should have worked and everyone will say dont work - but they do.

It’s not just CM2350’s. I’m showing corruption on CM2250’s. I’m doing some tests this week but I will have a screen file where you can verify address offset corruption when flashed with INSITE 7.6. I’ve proven it in testing yesterday and today. I’m advising everyone to get rid of 7.6 at this point especially if using any newer assembly.